Moab Slickrock Metallic Pearl 260 (24″x50′ Roll)
$121.09
In stock
Description
Slickrock Metallic Pearl 260 (24″x50′ Roll) from Moab is a 260 g/m2 paper with a metallic finish. The paper’s high gloss and metallic finish provide a unique lifelike, almost 3D quality to any image. The paper is suited for both black and white as well as color prints. The paper is recommended for use with pigment-based ink but can also be used with dye-based ink.
Additional information
| Weight | 7.15 lbs |
|---|---|
| Dimensions | 25.6 × 7.4 × 6.4 in |
| Coating | Resin |
| Basis Weight | 260 gsm |
| Thickness | 12 mil / 0.3047 mm |
| Opacity | 99% |
| Brightness | 80% |
| Single/Double-Sided | Single |
| Surface Finish | Metallic, Luster |
| Dimensions (W x L) | 24" x 50' / 61 cm x 15.2 m |
Reviews (93)
93 reviews for Moab Slickrock Metallic Pearl 260 (24″x50′ Roll)
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Related products
$132.79
Printer Paper
Printer Paper
Marcel Kuhn (verified owner) –
This paper looks great with night scene photos and more contemporary looking photos. I definitely recommend this paper!
Andy Block (verified owner) –
Prints well on my printer
Mariana Renner (verified owner) –
Moab is a good company & their products have served me well !
Kathryn Hessel (verified owner) –
I experimented with the paper for both b&w and color prints. The b&w looks exceptional nice, but the color also has something to recommend it: a watercolor look. I’m putting this paper into my repertoire.
Rahsaan Mertz (verified owner) –
I enjoy printing certain images on a metallic finish paper for a more 3 dimensional look. It is not easy to find 11×14 sized papers of this type, so it is a treat when I can print the slightly larger album or wall print size on my home printer.
Gus Schmeler (verified owner) –
I’ve taken a series of toy camera photographs with my Diana F+ of an abandoned amusement park and in my mind it required a paper that would best show-off not only the decay of the park but also the quirkiness gained from such a simple piece of equipment. With the paper’s beautiful, pearl and metallic sheen, and it’s true-ness to the odd colorations, the images pop right off the page. I brought them to an informal throw-down at a local photography gallery, and my fellow photographers were as excited about the paper as they were the images. I can’t find fault with the paper–the mill’s profile was spot-on, so I was able to print without the drudgery of adjusting and readjusting settings to make the stock work with my printer and computer. So of course, I’m now intrigued and am ordering sample packages of Moab’s other paper.
Jamar Zemlak (verified owner) –
I’ve had another brand of Metallic Pearl that worked out much better. Just not impressed with the depth of the image I received with the other brand.
Jayce Dare (verified owner) –
Any moisture from touching or even breathing heavily on this paper destroys the print…paper turns white…beautiful prints but they would have to be immediately sealed in some way from moisture in air or from people handling it. Cannot be sealed with any liquid sealant as you can with regular photo paper…that turns it white. I dont think anyone but professional print shops who can seal it instantly after printing would be able to produce a lasting print.
Miracle Witting (verified owner) –
I like the high resolution and the subtlety of the metallic effect. It adds some very nice enhancement without looking gimmicky. When you want to make things obvious than the Metallic Silver is the way to go. But when you want the extra reflection without being so obvious, this Metallic Pearl is great.
Dillon Bogisich (verified owner) –
This is now my primary printing paper. Bright and vibrant colors and a wonderful profile that gives me fantastic compatibility with my P800. I highly recommend this paper.
Kallie Kovacek (verified owner) –
Really nice paper, Has a pearl feel to it. Prints nice with the Epson 900 series with HDR inks. Rich colors, good black, good contrast. Does scratch easily !! Handle with care. Have sold some prints on this paper just after a few days of having them displayed. Pricey! but worth it.
Monserrate Mosciski (verified owner) –
I was looking for a 11×14 option for paper and this seemed to be the best option. The only challenge that I had was figuring out what paper type matched up with my printer. Once out found that out I was good to go. My printer is an Epson P-900 and this is what I found… Slickrock Pearl uses Premium Photo Paper Semigloss Slickrock Silver uses Premium Photo Paper Glossy
Horacio Heaney (verified owner) –
This paper does have a lovely sheen and, I think, is best suited for images with a warmer/ yellowish character. I used it in a head-to-head print off with Canon Pro Platinum & Canon Semi-Gloss. The sane picture file (unaltered per sheet) was used for all prints-and the same printer settings (except different ICC for the Semi-Gloss). The photo was a landscape (lots of sun) with the sun behind me. The Canon Pro Platinum displayed the brightest image with the most natural color. The Canon Semi-Gloss and the Metallic Pearl 260 were fairly close for color, with the Semi-Gloss being just a little more natural in color-the Metallic Pearl has a distinctive yellow cast-that is very nice with warmer colors-but I find, not so natural. I thought the image detail was better with the Canon paper as well. I then tried two different photos -under the same conditions-and found the same results! The Metallic Pearl 260 is, also, very delicate-and must be handled with great care! I, also cannot see where the M.Pearl paper can be used without being dry mounted for display; very limp!? D.Leary
Kendrick Pfeffer (verified owner) –
I love this paper for printing, give super sharp detail lately for 11 x 14 printing its all I use
Delia Cartwright (verified owner) –
For the past few years, my favorite photo paper for 5 x 7 prints was a luster paper. I decided to try the Moab Metallic Pearl paper because of the positive reviews. I edited several images with Lightroom 5 and downloaded the ICC profile for my Pixma Pro-1 printer. For each image, I printed a luster version and a metallic version for comparison. I was amazed at the difference. The metallic paper really produced absolutely intense colors! (I don’t know how this paper would work with default settings on a different printer but LR5 tweaking and the Moab ICC profile for my printer made awesome prints.)
Shayna Feil (verified owner) –
This paper make some beautiful photos. It brings out the beauty of the photo.
Immanuel Rosenbaum (verified owner) –
Clean and crisp colors and contrast with a subtle metallic sheen. Works great with my Epson. This is my go to paper for all my nature photography prints.
Erik Wilkinson (verified owner) –
There are dozens upon dozens of papers out there and the majority of professional quality papers perform as they are expected to perform. What differentiates papers is feel, look, base color, surface characteristics, etc. Ultimately, when choosing from among professional quality papers, whether you like something or not comes down to a matter of personal taste. I use metallic papers for certain Black & White images. I have never printed color on a metallic paper. I’ve used metallic papers by Red River, Ilford, Hahnemuhle, and now Moab. Moab is a bit less glossier than the Ilford and Red River, so I would call it a soft gloss. I’ve done about 10 prints thus far (pigment HP B9180). They produce rich blacks and extremely crisp–quasi-metallic–whites, which is why one chooses such a paper. Basically, this one is up there with the best of them.
Eugenia Stiedemann (verified owner) –
Perfect for landscape , people often comment on the 3D look it gives to my photos ! I highly recommend .
Rocio Morissette (verified owner) –
There are 2 Moab ‘metallics’, this being the less silver (the other looks very silver). I didn’t really want paper this silver and probably got it confused with the Inkpress metallic which appears more like regular paper. This will limit the number of photos I will use it for but don’t get the idea there is anything wrong with the paper – there isn’t.