Museo Portfolio Rag Paper (24 x 36″, 25 Sheets)
$238.13
In stock
Description
This 25 sheet-pack of 24 x 36″ Portfolio Rag from Museo is an extra smooth matte fine art paper for photographic images. It is made from 100% cotton rag and offers a basis weight of 300 gsm along with a thickness of 17 mil for a high-quality feel. Also, it has a rated brightness of 91%. The archival quality of this paper produces a very long life span thanks to an acid free and internally buffered design. Also, since this paper uses no optical brightening agents, it remains color accurate for a longer time.
Additional information
| Weight | 20.2 lbs |
|---|---|
| Dimensions | 39 × 28 × 3.9 in |
| Material | Cotton Rag |
| Basis Weight | 300 gsm |
| Thickness | 17 mil / 0.4318 mm |
| Opacity | 98% |
| Brightness | 91% |
| Single/Double-Sided | Single |
| Surface Finish | Matte |
| Quantity | 25 Sheets |
| Sheet Size (W x L) | 24 x 36" / 60.96 x 91.44 cm |
Reviews (8)
8 reviews for Museo Portfolio Rag Paper (24 x 36″, 25 Sheets)
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Related products
Printer Paper
Printer Paper
Printer Paper
Printer Paper
Printer Paper
Printer Paper
Meta Gutkowski (verified owner) –
Until recently my two favorite matte rag papers were Hahnemulhe Photo Rag and Moab Entrada Fine Art Natural. I learned about this paper in the australian site ImageScience, I give it a try and I’m sold to it. Fine art prints are gorgeous with this paper, B&W or color, doesn’t matter.
Viva Gottlieb (verified owner) –
Excellent and consistent quality. One of only two brands I ever use.
Santa Effertz (verified owner) –
This is a superb paper for B&W prints. The ultra-smooth surface disappears revealing beautiful midtones and rich shadows. Sharpness and detail are excellent. Anyone who thinks that matte papers cannot equal glossy papers in sharpness is simply wrong. I use an Epson 3880 with ImagePrint driver and gray profile. I can honestly say that I am getting the best B&W prints of my life. I have not used Museo Portfolio Rag for color prints, because of a relatively narrow color gamut (ImagePrint profile again) and questions regarding print longevity, especially with the yellow ink. I do not think that should be much of an issue with grayscale prints.
Bertram Oberbrunner (verified owner) –
This is without question, the best paper I have used to date for my black and white photographs. The image quality displays all of the nuances I want to deliver in my work. Well worth the money!
Creola Ernser (verified owner) –
My favorite matte paper by a long measure, Moab Entrada similar but not as sturdy.
Ervin Bins (verified owner) –
without reservation the most beautiful fine art color prints!
Elinor Walker (verified owner) –
I have recently been testing Museo Portfolio Rag for fine art B&W prints, and I think it is probably the best paper that I have used for that purpose. The smooth surface essentially disappears leaving the viewer with a three dimensional appearing image with beautiful mid-tones and rich shadows. MPR is OBA free, and the base paper color is slightly warm, but less so than other OBA papers that I have tried. I should mention that I print with ImagePrint, which has superb profiles for this and other papers. I have not tried printing color images on MPR and probably will not use it for that purpose, as soft proofing with ImagePrint profiles suggests a rather narrow color gamut. Nevertheless, for matte B&W prints, which comprises most of my work, it is superb.
Kacey Swaniawski (verified owner) –
I purchased this paper based on my personal use of Museo in the past. The paper itself has a lovely silky texture on the surface and renders blacks beautifully. However, the box I received had a consistent flaw on every single sheet in the box, which I only noticed on printing on almost every sheet. About 2 inches from the top on the longest size was an indent in the paper, the full length, of about 2-3mm wide. The flaw was visible under fluro light and I made 8-10 snaps of the flaw and sent it to B&H. I also requested a full refund and was advised that I would have to return the whole box of prints. As a fine art photographer I would never provide prints of a full series of work to anyone except the gallery that represents my work. I pointed this out to B&H and was told in writing that I would be offered only a 25% refund if I didn’t send back the full box. This was negotiated to 50% in the end. It is deplorable that despite my providing evidence of the flaw which is present on every single page, the only way to receive a refund was to send original artworks to B&H. I won’t be buying this paper again and where possible will shop from other suppliers.